AI-native transformation · 12-week pathway
Scope and deliver an agreed 12-week change programme beyond a single workflow.
Before contract, we fix the functions and workflows in scope, participant load, governance, deliverables, acceptance gates, exclusions, delivery team, price, and exit terms. Qualified 12-week scopes are quoted within a $120,000–$250,000 range.
One related company-scale engagement
Delivery experience across 124 people and 20 job families over 12 weeks.
These are participation, scope, and duration counts from one engagement—not audited business-outcome proof. Qualified buyers can review the measurement method, approved evidence, limitations, and available reference process during diligence.
Outputs are fixed in the SOW, not discovered after kickoff
- A client-approved map of only the people, workflows, systems, and decisions inside the contracted scope, with access and confidentiality controls.
- A fixed number of named workflows with defined environments, human approvals, evaluation thresholds, rollback, and production boundaries.
- Role-specific learning for the contracted functions, with participant hours, manager responsibilities, and competency measures agreed in advance.
- A governance charter, adoption measures, artifact register, and named internal lead with agreed authority, capacity, and handoff tests.
Initial fit criteria
150–500 people, with several AI pilots that have not moved into shared operating practice
An executive sponsor, operational gatekeeper, and internal programme lead with protected capacity
Willingness to fix scope, participant load, governance, evidence, workforce safeguards, and budget before contract
The landscape
Two options. Neither built for what you actually need.
AI adoption support splits into expensive generalists and platform-locked toolkits. Neither leaves you with a system you can audit, price, or hand off to your own team.
Big Consulting Firms
The default when budget isn't the constraint
- Priced by the hourThe incentive is more hours in the room, not a faster finish to a working system.
- Junior teams do the workThe partner who pitched you usually isn't the one building it.
- A recommendation, not a systemYou get a roadmap and a deck. Somebody still has to go build what it recommends.
- What you're left withA shelf plan and an invoice.
Cloud Vendor Programs
Bundled into the contract you already have
- Built to sell the platformThe tools included are the ones that keep you inside their cloud, not necessarily the ones that fit how your teams already work.
- One framework for every companyGeneric adoption playbooks that don't account for your regulatory constraints, your org structure, or your culture.
- Usage, not adoptionSuccess gets measured in licenses activated and API calls, not in workflows that actually changed.
- What you're left withA dashboard full of usage numbers and no proof anyone's job actually changed.
The Specialized Approach
Assessment-led. Owned by your team when we leave.
- Fixed scope, fixed costOne number, agreed before we start, with a named internal lead who owns the handoff.
- Deployed, not recommendedWe ship the agentic workflows your teams use on Monday morning, not a deck telling someone else to build them.
- Your team runs the assessmentThe Company Brain audit happens inside your systems, with your team leads at the table. It's your map, not a verdict handed down.
- What you're left withA working system, a trained team, and a named person on your side who can run it without us. The case studies below show what we built and handed over.
Contracted pathway
Four phases with a client-owned gate between each.
The SOW assigns weeks, owners, inputs, deliverables, acceptance criteria, and stop/go rights for every phase.
01
Map
Approve the in-scope operating map, evidence baseline, data and interview plan, risk register, governance, and prioritized workflow list.
02
Build
Implement the contracted workflow count against named environments, evaluations, human controls, and acceptance tests.
03
Learn
Run the agreed role-specific curricula and competency checks within the participant-hour budget and workforce safeguards.
04
Transfer
Complete owner-led operating tests, hand over the artifact register and unresolved-risk log, and make the client’s stop, extend, or internalize decision.
How we work
Governance and delivery. Never one without the other.
Every workflow ships with an audit trail, a named internal owner, and adoption data - the things your own leadership will ask about before they'll trust it.
Governance First
We work inside your existing security review process, not a generic policy template. A named owner signs off before the first workflow ships.
Deployed, Not Demoed
We don't hand you a recommendation and leave. We hand you agentic workflows in production, a trained team, and documented processes.
Built for Daily Work
Every workflow ships against real work in your queue, then gets reviewed weekly against usage and time saved before we call it done - not left as a kickoff demo we walk away from.
Human Workflows
We map how people already work, then build the AI around it: routine drafting, first-pass data pulls, and triage move to the system, so your team spends its time on the calls that need judgment.
Named Hypotheses, Not Hype
We won't tell you AI changes everything. We'll tell you exactly where it will and won't help, with a specific hypothesis and a way to measure whether it worked.
Adoption Isn't an Accident
We plan for resistance before it shows up: role-specific training scoped into the same fixed number as the build, a named internal owner, and adoption tracked in your own systems, not ours.
Workforce and data safeguards
Vibrana changes systems and practices; the client retains employment authority.
Before contract, the parties agree the workforce-impact assessment, participant hours, employee-data boundaries, consultation responsibilities, AI provider and subprocessor schedule, data flows, retention and deletion, incident ownership, and audit access.
Start with a diagnostic
Map reported readiness risks before deciding whether to fund a larger engagement.
The 38-question self-assessment covers six dimensions and produces a personalized report. It is a structured conversation aid, not a validated prediction or substitute for technical, security, workforce, or operating diligence.
Dimensions: leadership and strategy, data readiness, technology infrastructure, talent and capability, governance and responsible AI, and culture and change readiness. Weighted scores summarize your answers; company context and recommendations are clearly separated from verified evidence.
Contact details and answers are stored to deliver the report and manage assessment-related follow-up. Public company content may be processed through Firecrawl and Anthropic for optional context. The privacy policy explains providers and your access, correction, objection, and deletion rights.
Take the Readiness AssessmentEnterprise Inquiry
Discuss a bounded 12-week transformation scope
Tell us what has already been tried, the executive decision to be made, the functions under consideration, and the evidence required. A conversation creates no obligation or automatic expansion.